<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deposit a check with the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:24:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/?p=343#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t imagine the things happening on the backend are too different that if you were to deposit your check in a branch at a local bank.

When you deposit a check in person, they run the check through a scanner.  When you get your bank statement, you will typically see images of all of the checks you deposited that month. It&#039;s all done digitally.  It&#039;s just that until this point, the banks weren&#039;t willing to give us our own scanners :-)

The only area where I can see it being very different is the endorsement recognition.  In a bank, someone can read your endorsement.  But with Deposit@Mobile, something does have to recognize that you have endorsed the check.  If you have not endorsed the check, it throws and error.  While I don&#039;t think it knows *what* you are writing, it probably looks for a certain amount of contrast between that area and the rest of the check.  Of course, I&#039;m no genius, but this would make sense to me.

Lastly, though there is a high probably of fraud with this type of technology, USAA has a cult-like following and most people love working with them.  Given their customer base, I would imagine they are at a lower risk for fraud that the banks you see on every corner.  Everyone who uses this feature is required to have a USAA credit card.  If the check doesn&#039;t go through, the card gets charge for the amount of the check plus a fee.  I imagine if this happens too many time they revoke your privileges to use the service.  But again, this is all just speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t imagine the things happening on the backend are too different that if you were to deposit your check in a branch at a local bank.</p>
<p>When you deposit a check in person, they run the check through a scanner.  When you get your bank statement, you will typically see images of all of the checks you deposited that month. It&#8217;s all done digitally.  It&#8217;s just that until this point, the banks weren&#8217;t willing to give us our own scanners <img src='http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The only area where I can see it being very different is the endorsement recognition.  In a bank, someone can read your endorsement.  But with Deposit@Mobile, something does have to recognize that you have endorsed the check.  If you have not endorsed the check, it throws and error.  While I don&#8217;t think it knows *what* you are writing, it probably looks for a certain amount of contrast between that area and the rest of the check.  Of course, I&#8217;m no genius, but this would make sense to me.</p>
<p>Lastly, though there is a high probably of fraud with this type of technology, USAA has a cult-like following and most people love working with them.  Given their customer base, I would imagine they are at a lower risk for fraud that the banks you see on every corner.  Everyone who uses this feature is required to have a USAA credit card.  If the check doesn&#8217;t go through, the card gets charge for the amount of the check plus a fee.  I imagine if this happens too many time they revoke your privileges to use the service.  But again, this is all just speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/?p=343#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Thanks. The theme is actually one I created from scratch.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. The theme is actually one I created from scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enterceelewly</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>enterceelewly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/?p=343#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Sorry for commenting Off-Topic - which WP theme do you use? It looks great.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for commenting Off-Topic &#8211; which WP theme do you use? It looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/?p=343#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I wondered about what&#039;s happening on the backend as well... based on the various error messages I&#039;ve gotten from Deposit@Home, I&#039;m guess they have some sort of image recognition technology that  detects certain predetermined areas of the check for proper sequences of numbers (routing and account). They probably can&#039;t detect whether it is indeed your signature or not, but they can detect whether or not SOME text scribblings are there. Then, I&#039;m sure all checks are given some sort of probability of fraud rating, then those with a high rating are screened by real people.

Very interesting, nonetheless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered about what&#8217;s happening on the backend as well&#8230; based on the various error messages I&#8217;ve gotten from Deposit@Home, I&#8217;m guess they have some sort of image recognition technology that  detects certain predetermined areas of the check for proper sequences of numbers (routing and account). They probably can&#8217;t detect whether it is indeed your signature or not, but they can detect whether or not SOME text scribblings are there. Then, I&#8217;m sure all checks are given some sort of probability of fraud rating, then those with a high rating are screened by real people.</p>
<p>Very interesting, nonetheless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/deposit-a-check-with-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyosborn.com/blog/?p=343#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Pretty awesome, I&#039;ve used it a couple of times now myself. When do they release the app that lets me make a cash withdrawal from my phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty awesome, I&#8217;ve used it a couple of times now myself. When do they release the app that lets me make a cash withdrawal from my phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
